Sunday, August 27, 2017

Save the Date (Sept 7th) for the Water Vote

Save the Date!  September 7th at 6:30pm (stay tuned for more details)

Chester will be sending out more details soon, we are waiting on the finalized agenda from Supervisor Frazier’s office.  However I decided to get this out now, to give a heads up.  There will be a big association meeting on Thursday September 7th at 6:30.  It’s critical that everyone tries to make this meeting; regarding the future of RH Water.  We will hear about our 3 different water options and we will take a vote at the end of the meeting.  This vote is not a binding vote on Madera County.  However, it will be a vote to demonstrate the direction our community residents want our supervisor and the B.O.S. to pursue.  Supervisor Frazier wants to get a strong sense of what direction the community desires.  

At this meeting you will hear about the three options: 
1) Stay with County 
2) Support of County to Sell the System to CalWater 
3) Support of County to Sell the System to Bakman Water and his investment partners

Again, It's Important that you attend!

Overview: Basically all RH residents have the same common goal: (My Opinion)

We want a reliable, stable, and trouble free water system at a fair price.  We want these problems related to water delivery, to be a thing of the past, and we don’t want to hear about the details of why our water system doesn’t work, or that we need to raise more capital to repair or improve our water system.

We want to “Re-Green” our community and increase our property values back to where they should be, if we had a reliable and trouble free water system.  Or at least, a company that we could trust and hold accountable to keep our water system in good order.

We want a company that knows what they are doing, has the capital ready to fix the problems, immediately, when they arise, and we don’t want hear about the details.  We want a company that has their management in order with extensive experience, a good reputation, reliable, and has the financial resources to keep us in water.

Thursday, June 29, 2017

June 29th Update on Water

Update on 6/29/2017

I’m sure everyone is wondering what the status is on our water system:

On June 19th, Calwater issued a letter of interest to Supervisor Frazier expressing their interest in taking over our water system.  They mentioned normally they wouldn’t be interested in a system of our size, however due to all the development in our area, they are willing to take on our system and the deal would be kept separate from any other acquisitions through Madera County.

·        The rates are projected to be somewhere in the neighborhood of $100 to $125 per month, depending on if you use a lot of water.
·         Their projection of an average household use for our area, based on lased year’s usage, was 21,000 cf per household.  Therefore on their proposed rate schedule (which is the same as Selma’s) the average monthly cost (based on last year’s use) would be approx. $102 per month. 
·         Of course some months higher some lower, that is the estimated average.  They said they could offer a balance payment plan, for those who prefer more consistent monthly payment.  In addition, they have a low-income program for discounted rates to those who qualify.  For example, if you qualify for the PG&E low income program, you should qualify for Calwater's.
·         In a meeting with Calwater, they plan to make an investment in our water system of up to 2 million, if needed, to replace the arsenic treatment facility and upgrade infrastructure to make our system reliable.  By reliable, I mean IN FULL COMPLIANCE, You can water your lawns, your property values will go up!  You can sell your home, honestly, if you so choose to.
·        Calwater's attorneys believe we should not have to pay off the bond debt to sell the system, contradictory to what the county council advises.  Therefore presently, the county council is reviewing the legal requirements and reviewing the citations of Calwater’s attorneys.
·         We will have a public meeting when this is figured out. Please keep in mind, even if we stayed with the county for water, they are pushing for a rate increase (similar, or more than the amount Calwater is projecting here), and I believe they would not contribute as much as Calwater is willing to; towards the capital improvements. (Nor correctly).

In addition, there is still hope that we might get a backup well connection from the Gunner property, they were testing it last week and the output is over 1000 gallons per minute.  Supervisor Frazier thinks the county might start working on making a connection to this well, to our system; soon.  They are waiting on test results now.  All that prep work we were seeing on lanes bridge and 10, might have been for us; so we need to be appreciative of that; and cross our fingers we can have access to this well; if the water quality tests come back accordingly.

Right now we are still in a wait mode.  I will let you know as soon as all is ready for community discussion.

Tuesday, June 6, 2017

Update on Calwater Evaluation

Here it is about 3 weeks after our big association meeting, where the members who were present unanimously voted to pursue a partnership with a large water company, with financial strength, such as Calwater.  I am sure many of you are very concerned and are wondering if any progress is being made about our water situation.  It can be uneasy sitting on the sidelines waiting for answers to such important questions.   Questions such as: what is happening in regards to our most precious resource; a resource which we all so desperately depend on?  You may be wondering is anything being done to fix this problem?  As I promised at the meeting, “I would be all over it,” and I would keep in frequent communications with Calwater and the County, on the behalf of our community.

The purpose of this post is an attempt to reassure you that the wheels are turning and there is a strong possibility that we can once again have our neighborhoods green, with beautiful green grass for our mature landscapes, and the healthy trees we would expect from our wonderful Rolling Hills.  For the first time, in a long time, I have hope we may find a possible solution to our water problems; in a relatively quick fashion.   In addition, we could have a company with resources, who knows what they are doing at the controls.  When I say relatively quick, I mean by next spring.

Lets face it, and I think we all came to this very realization at the last association meeting, we cannot take chances on our water system, and time is of the essence.  Some members at the association meeting expressed, “what good is it to try and save money, while our trees are dying and our landscapes look like deserts?” What is our community worth, and what are our houses are worth, if we cannot use the water we need for ourselves and our landscapes?

Since our association meeting, there have been three meetings between Calwater and the County.  Which I had the honor of sitting in on.  On Wednesday May 24, Tuesday May 30, and Monday June 5th.  At the first meeting between Brett Frazier, Norman Allinder, and Bill Cambell, the county reassured us they are sincere about possibility releasing control of the water system.  Calwater would not usually consider taking over a system, as small as ours, by itself.  However they are seriously considering taking us on, because of the additional growth surrounding us, and a few projects they are looking at which are not too far away.   The county shared there may be other county systems available for transition to Calwater.  However, it was re-affirmed that Rolling Hills is of the highest priority and the county as well as all stakeholders understand; we want to keep our system agreement independent; not dependent on any other system acquisitions.

At the next meeting on May 30th the Chief Executive Officers of Calwater came down, drove the neighborhood and then met with County folks at Mr Fraziers office.    CEO’s from Calwater asked questions to feel out the county’s intentions.  I was at the meeting, it felt as though the executives were satisfied with the answers and somewhat interested in taking on this project.  However they are concerned about the condition of our system, and the financial debt our system has.  This appeared to be an initial exploratory session; where the exec’s were evaluating the opportunity and future area opportunities.  They were taking this time to evaluate if this is and avenue they would consider pursuing.

At the most recent meeting, on Monday June 5th, Calwater sent out its engineering team to meet with county public works staff; they traveled to each well site at Rolling Hills, and their engineers took pictures and asked questions to county staff about the operations of the system.  Now they will write up an analysis of our water system, and submit and evaluation to Calwater exec’s.  They will use this report to explore the needs of our rolling hills waters system; both current and future.  Then they will make a decision in regards to if they are willing to take on our water system or not?


As I mentioned, I will keep everyone informed of any new developments and I will stay on top of this situation; as I have developed some solid relationship with the decision makers involved.

Below is an example of the rates Average, High, and Low usage (prepared by Eric Olsen) Based on Calwater's proposed rate schedule.


Friday, May 19, 2017

Last Night's Association Meeting


Thank you to everyone who attended the meeting last night.  It was quite a bit of information!  The county's public works director was there to remind us that we are still on water restrictions, because well 3 is still having Arsenic treatment problems. They are ramping up their citation efforts. If there is any good news, it would be they did get well 3 back online Thursday at just under ½ its rated output.  At the meeting we also learned from Eric more about the Budget and the many problems of unexplained expenses, increased operating costs, and unaudited financials.  John also presented some options with Tri-County Bank to pay off your bond debt early and save money.
 
At the meeting we presented 3 options to the association:  Calwater, Create Our Own Water Company, or stay with the County.  The members present were unanimously in favor of pursuing an agreement with Calwater.   Bill from Calwater spoke about his Corporation and how they operate.  He said they are regulated by the PUC and can only set rates, so they can see a profit of approximately 9% above their capital expenditures.  This means 9% above what they spend on our water system infrastructure.  Not, 9% on top of the routine maintenance.  Calwater has the resources and deep pockets to come in and make the capital improvements we need.   Bill from Calwater mentioned when making capital improvements they are generally less expensive than cost of a county project.  Bill states, when their is a problem, they fix it.  Its cheaper for them to fix it, then to have complaints and fines from the PUC.  Plus they have their reputation to protect, they do not want to devalue their stock.

Members spoke about their dissatisfaction with our current conditions, dead yards, devalued and ugly streets, their kids cant play outside because its full of stickers!  Many members are disgusted and fed-up with us having water restrictions; especially in a record rainfall, and surrounded by others who have the water to build new homes and water their crops.  Members say, they just cant understand what is happening to their once beautiful neighborhood. Other members spoke of their experience with Calwater and their relatives who have Calwater, as a water company, and their satisfaction.  Other members spoke of their extreme dissatisfaction with the county.  Not one person voted to stay with the county.  

I am in frequent communication with Bill at Calwater, Mr Frazier, and the Public Works Folks, and we will work on this tirelessly to get us a proposal within the next 6 to 8 weeks.  Bill says he needs that long to get his engineers out here to write up the analysis of our system and prepare an acquisition package.  Once we have this, your board members will let the association members know more details.  A realistic goal would be to get Calwater on our system correcting mistakes of the county by September and getting off restrictions by next spring.

PS  Some members expressed concern regarding the ones who pre-paid the bond.  Just to clarify,  Bill did answer on that.  There will be an equitable settlement for the ones that prepaid.  Most likely the 50 will get a refund, or some equitable credit.  Not to worry.  

Update: Monday 5/22/17 Bill tells me hes setting up a small team of engineers to come out within the next 2 weeks; ill keep you posted.



Wednesday, May 17, 2017

Continued Water Restrictions

On my last post, in early April, we were hearing we would soon get our, 2 days a week, watering allowance; as the Ranchos did.  In that post, I emphasized it would not be for sure, until we all received our letter in the mail from public works.  Apparently, we are not getting off stage 3.5 No outdoor watering, unless on drip.

I periodically inquired into when we would receive this notice, and I kept hearing.  It should be soon, they were in the process of doing some fine tuning or adjustments on well 3 and the Arsenic treatment plant, and as soon as that was done we should get our notice; approximately 2 weeks.

However, today I received news from Frazier’s staff.  They are having trouble getting the Arsenic treatment plant to work properly and the levels are too high to meet state requirements, therefore they cannot put well 3 back online. 

This means we are running our water system on just 1 well (well #2), and now they are panicked, because we had a low water alert on our storage tank, this Monday; we were down to 8 ½ feet of water on the storage tank.  Apparently, they claim that pump 2 is pumping 24/7 and was not keeping up with demand earlier this week.

I personally drove over to the tank this morning, and it appears the tank is full again.  However we are pushing the 1 well and pump we have online, hard; and we need to be aware of that. 

This is very upsettingThere is a breakdown in communication between the people we pay to manage our water system and us.  These are issues that were not revealed, until now.  Once again, when we can’t keep up with demand and are experiencing a problem.  Now they are driving the streets in the morning to see water in the streets and finding people watering their yards.  They want to remind us that we are still on water restrictions, and they are doing everything they can to get water.


Please plan to attend tomorrow night’s Association meeting, to hear more about these issues.  Brett will not be there, due to meetings in Sacramento.   However Ahmad from public works will be there to answer questions.  In addition, we will be sharing committee research information.

Thursday, April 6, 2017

Water Restrictions


We are hearing from sources at the county, that we shall soon be allowed for outdoor watering two days per week again.   However it will not be official until you receive notification in the mail.  Some of the reasons for this are the county’s plans to make some adjustments on our arsenic treatment facilities; which should increase our capacity.  In addition, due to the strong snow pack and increased rain this year, the water levels are looking much better.  


The RHCA Board continues to explore solutions and welcomes volunteers to help research long-term solutions.  We also plan to be involved in the county’s rate study, once they have the study prepared for discussion.  We will keep you posted, once the details of this study are revealed.  We appreciate your patience, and welcome your involvement. 

Sunday, March 5, 2017

Water and Volunteers? Are we still on restrictions?

Hello,

I am often asked by residents, "what is going on with our water?"  This leads me to believe many of you are wondering the same thing.  Therefore I would like to give you my current viewpoint on the situation, and encourage you to participate in potential solutions.  The Rolling Hills Citizen's Association is now looking for volunteers to participate in one of four committees (see the previous post). Even if you feel you do not have much to contribute, there is a committee you can join to help spread the word to the residents who live next to you. 

Here is my take on our current situation:

Are we going to get off stage 3.5 "No Turf Watering" by this spring or summer?

I do not see that happening, and here's why.  

Basically there are 3 alternatives:  

1) Stay with the county 
2) Privatize 
3) Sell out to a large water corporation.  

At this time we cannot get off restrictions this year with option 1 or 2 (details below), so that leaves option 3 as the avenue which would get us off restrictions the fastest. However many people are leery of selling out to a water corporation, losing so-called control, and most would want that to be fully vetted.  So that means no immediate solutions. Therefore the board is asking for volunteers to help with the vetting and to explore these options; including the county's financial management of our funds, and the water bond debt.  Will you please assist us, and join one of the committees? (previous post, scroll down this page)

Below I give you a more detailed explanation of we we are still in this situation (Water Restrictions):
  1. The State Waterboard and the County will not remove the restriction, until we have a backup water source.  The state regulations say "community water systems, must meet peek water demand during our highest month of demand" WITH IT'S TOP PRODUCING WELL (SOURCE) OFF-LINE. This means that we have to find a backup source of potable water, before getting off restrictions.
  2. The county states that our water system revenue is not high enough to make any capital improvements, (like another well) and we were already granted and emergency loan from the general fund last year to rehab a well and get us back on-line from one well to two. This loan helped us to get off the NO OUTDOOR WATERING (4) to Trees and Bushes only via drip (3.5). This loan is still unpaid, and there will be no more county loans until a rate study is completed and a rate increase is passed on our water system via a 218 election.  If there is no rate increase passed, we will stay on restrictions; furthermore if one of our current wells breaks down we will be back on No OUTDOOR WATERING (4); with no further emergency loans until a rate increase is passed by the voters.
  3. As mentioned at the last association meeting in January, we can not privatize our water system from the county, without paying off the $3.1m bond debt first.  
  4. The Gunner Well...  The gunner well option Brett spoke of at the January meeting is an attempt at negotiating an agreement with Richard Gunner to use that well (existing) as a back up source.  There are 2 issues with this: 1) References were made that if we were to gain access to that well, we may be required to approve the county to sell the system to Calwater.com; the company Gunner is negotiating with to run his wells.  2) Brett informs me that negotiations with Richard Gunner are currently at a stand still.  In my opinion, regardless of getting the Gunner well or not, the county wants either the rate increase, to manage the long-term improvements we need, or to get us over to a water corporation; and release themselves of the burden.  At this juncture, I don't see the majority of us ready to do either. 

Now It's time for all of you who want to help explore solutions, to get involved.  Please contact the board member below who is leading the committee you are best suited for.

Water System Research Volunteers Needed

Rolling Hills Citizens Association is looking for some ANSWERS!
Will you help us find them?
Will you participate in one of these groups?
GROUP 1- Where did our Water District money go?
The Financial Accountability Committee will examine the Water District financial statements Madera County has provided us. We are looking for volunteers with experience reading financial documents who can help us research the financial reports of our water system and discuss the details of the research with County Supervisors and/or their staff.

CONTACT ERIC OLSEN:  emolsen1@gmail.com or 559- 960-4285.       
GROUP 2- What are our Options for Water System Ownership?
The Options Committee will investigate water system ownership options, including privatization, water companies regulated by the PUC, and remaining under Madera County control.  These options will be compared and contrasted, in order to present those findings to the Board and Association members. We are looking for volunteers with experience in any of these areas: online research, phone research, business management, budgeting, or spreadsheets.

CONTACT DAVID FRISBY:   instructordavid@gmail.com
Or ROSEANN GALVAN:   roseroller@yahoo.com or 559-906-3696.
GROUP 3- How can we get rid of our Bond Debt?
The Bond Committee will investigate the documents regarding our 2008 improvement bond. We are looking for volunteers who have experience with loans, bonds, or with finance options.  Is the bond assumable? Can we find another way to finance our debt? Are their resources that individuals could use to pay off their share of the debt?  

CONTACT JOHN DAVIES:   559-438-8839.
GROUP 4- How do we get the neighborhood mobilized?
The Organizing Committee will build a network of relationships to communicate with RHCA members across the entire neighborhood and reach out to neighbors who are unaware or uninvolved. We are looking for volunteers who enjoy talking with their neighbors and want to see them involved in solving our water issues.   

CONTACT CHESTER GOODALE:  559-360-9432 or rollinghills.citizens@gmail.com
We hope to hear from you by March 5th!
That way we can begin working at our March 9th Board Meeting!

Thursday, October 20, 2016

10/20/16 Update

***Update 10/20/16


Hello!

Interesting meeting last Thursday, and congratulations to our 3 new board members, Eric, Chester, and Roseann!  

I have some additional information regarding the Water.  I spoke with Kassy today. She thinks if we did form a Mutual Water Company, we could be eligible for a low interest rate loan of under 2% from State Revolving Water Fund.  In addition, she seems to think we are at a low risk for future legislation affecting our water system; in regards to water balancing (Water Sustainability Act)
She says systems approximately under 1000 connections are in the "White Area", and not required to meet as stringent water balancing requirements.  However some of the main concerns for any permit approval issued to operate a "private" Mutual Water Company" would be that our source capacity meet guidelines, our operations management be in order, sustainability: rates reflect operations and infrastructure needs, plan to meet the meter mandates, and conservation plan.   

Brett responded today that he will get us outstanding debt amount of CSA19

___________________________________________________________________________
Below are some links from the state water board and info on mutual water companies.  



Here is the link to the information on the available funding.

It will take me a little more time to gather the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act information.  I will forward the information once I am able to determine answers to your questions.

Thanks,


Kassy D. Chauhan, P.E.
Senior Sanitary Engineer – Merced District

From: Ramsden, Bruce@Waterboards
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2016 10:35 AM
To: instructordavid@gmail.com
Subject: SWRCB DDW Links

David, nice talking with you this morning, and I hope I have answered most of your questions. 

IN the meantime, here are the links to pages we discussed today.

Below, is what I consider our “home” page, and it provides links to various topics we discussed (California Waterworks Standards Regulations) and most likely a lot we did not.


Here is a link to the specific page you were asking me about regarding, “what should a water system prepare for in the future that may impact water quality, monitoring, treatment and NEW regulated contaminates that systems are required to monitor for.”  It is a page about upcoming regulations (from home page to the quick link for Regulations and Statutes, then the link at the bottom, “Upcoming Regulations for Drinking Water and Recycled Water.”






https://privatewaterlaw.com/2011/02/18/california-mutual-water-company-basics/
http://calmutuals.org/about-mutuals/
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=corp&group=14001-15000&file=14300-14307




Thursday, October 13, 2016

10/13/16 Update

10/13/16 Update

I received some information from Brett and the County Attorney.  It is possible for us to privatize the water system; and Brett believes they would transfer ownership to us for a the $1; after approval by the BOS.  One condition, is that any outstanding debt of CSA 19 would have to be paid off before the transfer.  The annual water revenues ($241,000 currently) would go to our new water district, and we would need to appoint a board to manage that.  There are many issues that need to be considered before we could even attempt to move forward on this, however at least we know there is an option.

Regarding the well negotiations Brett mentioned before.  It is a well Gunner has on 10 and Lanes bridge, its a municipal well, and has never been used.  It is still and few months away before we know if this can be a reality, and we still don't know what the cost would be for this well either.

Please keep in mind tonight's meeting is not primarily about water, its focus will be to figure out the direction and leadership of our citizens association.  Therefore if you want to be involved with board membership, let that be known.

PS
If I am nominated, I will have to respectfully decline under the current structure of the organization.  I would be happy to serve on a water committee and continue helping out to the best of my abilities.

If we were to hold a vote tonight authorizing the use of the Association funds to create a corporation / non profit, and purchase directors and officers insurance (Approx $1500 to form and $650 for annual insurance); I would accept.







Monday, October 10, 2016

Update 10/10/16

Update 10/10/16

I contacted Mr Frazier today, he stated he hasn't heard back from the county attorney yet; regarding the steps to privatization.  He expects to have some information by this Thursday.

Attached are the Rolling Hills Citizens Association's by-laws.  (Click Here)  The articles and amendments appear to look official.  This is a similar type of document one would submit to the SOS to become a registered non-profit.  The association's bylaws makes RHCA appear official; whether actually registered with the State or not.  If it has not been reviewed by an attorney specializing in this area, we should get that done; in addition to legal advice on forming a registered non-profit.

It is my opinion, if we wish to carry on this look-a-like association, we should make it legal.  We should provide Directors & Officers insurance for our board member's "Peace of Mind"; only costs about $600 per year (checking on this).  If we are going act like a board, we should be a real board, and obtain the proper insurance policies to protect it.   Here is a link to an insurance company who specializes in Directors and Officers insurance.   One of the few companies provide coverage for voluntary associations.  The policy is estimated to by around $600 year, however we would have to be at least in the application process of a 501c3 non profit.

In addition, we have the issue of annual dues being only $10 a year.  This is far too low, its just unrealistic.   I propose the dues should be at least $10 month, or $100 if paid early lump sum.  This would actually start to build a fund, in which the board could actually make some improvements to the neighborhood; keep the medians clean, pay for insurances, flyers, websites, initial law consultants etc.  What good is it to have an association with no budget?  The funds and its usage would be posted on the RHCA website and its use would be transparent.

Lastly, thank you to those who have contributed.  Your comments are being read!  In this past week there have been over 1536 page views on the blog.


Wednesday, October 5, 2016

UPDATE... Conversation with Mr. Frazier


*******UPDATE: 10/5/16********

I spoke with Brett Frazier this morning, and apparently between the calls Dale made and after meeting with Mr Frazier, the county is re-thinking the pipe replacement.  Mr Frazier met with Ahmad and Phil T. to re-examine the $5.1 million project.  If after testing, the pipes show to be in compliant condition, they will consider deferring the infrastructure improvement project, until much further down the road.  However, in the rate study (underway) they will budget for a reserve account; for capital improvement projects that we will eventually need someday.  In addition, they are considering installing the wireless meters in the back of the property; and its looking like a real possibility.  This is good news.  

Brett still plans to get us the information from the attorney on the privatization process; as he has confirmed if we do choose that route, they are fine with it.  At least, we can acquire all of this information and examine our options; even if we decide to remain with the county running our water district.

In addition, Brett is in negotiations attempting to work a contract for us to use or purchase a Municipal well already developed close to our community.  If successful, this would get us off water restrictions the quickest and give us the capacity we need at the lowest cost.  It may be a couple months before he knows if this can be a reality.

** If you are trying to comment, click the anonymous drop down, and then click "not a robot"

Sunday, October 2, 2016

Research On Water Possibilities

Hello Rolling Hills Residents, 

These are my personal opinions after doing the research; I hope this will help inform some of you who have no clue about what the heck is going on. 

After researching and speaking to water professionals since our town hall meeting two weeks ago, I have prepared summary of that research, and included my personal opinions. This summary includes an investigation into solving the Rolling Hills water capacity issues, and initial research into the possibility of privatizing the Rolling Hills Water System.

Basically, to meet the capacity requirements the state requires, we need a third well.  At first glance, it may seem unnecessary for our community to spend on the cost of a new well; considering our current production does meet the demand needed.  However, the state’s requirement of meeting the highest month’s demand, even with the top producing well off-line, is a valid attempt in preventing situations, such as the one Rolling Hill’s Residents found themselves in this past spring. 

The way I see it, Rolling Hill’s residents have two choices.  We can either continue to take the easy way out; and rely on the county to manage our water and roads.  However, with that decision, we can expect more of the same issues returning for many years to come.  I say this because residents will not vote for the county’s rate increases; due to the county’s over inflated projected costs for each project we need, or might need.  Therefore the county will manage our system so that we do get the minimum needed to survive; any upgrades or improvements above the basics will be at a premium cost.  To repeat, this cost will be far more than what most resident will agree to pay, and therefore the county will be stuck with the bill; which in-turn means that we will get the minimum.  I expect this is the path most residents will choose; either due to inaction or fear of losing the county safety net.

The alternative is that we can band together and privatize, possibly vote to become a real association, and pay for our own improvements at a fraction of the cost; which we eventually pay for anyway. For example, would you rather pay $800,000 for a new well & land, or remain on water restrictions and pay $2,000,000 or more for the county to do it?  Would you rather pay $335,000 for new meters, or $5,100,000 for pipes and meters?  Whatever the county can do, we can do it cheaper and more efficiently.

The numbers:  We can either pay $5,700  ($27 month) per house privately, or $21,417 per house ($102 month) with the county.  This would get us a new well, rehab well 2, meters, and create a $700,000 reserve.  With the county, the $21,417 would get a new well, rehab well 2, meters, and new mains.  In addition, those who have mains in the back, will have to pay separately to connect to the new main.  (See Attached Exhibit)  A side note: (for an additional $25 month we could get all the roads in Rolling Hills Re-paved)   We are one of the very few communities who do not pay a road assessment. The roads in Rolling Hills will remain in disrepair and will never get done without one.  Would you rather pay $50 month for water and new roads or $102 per month for the county’s water plan?  When you see the Rolling Hills Rate study, which will not pass the 218, I predict the projected monthly rate will be $150 month plus $1.80 per 1000 gallons/ mo (prepare for a projected water bill of $200 to $250 per month) (See MD95 Rate Study Info Below) (Attached) (Of course the monthly payments subject to ability to obtain financing)

Yes these are hard choices; the type of choices where most people, just do nothing.  It is easier to do nothing, and blame the county then to have the courage to take responsibility for ourselves.  When the developer of the community created Rolling Hills; he relied on the residents, not the county to take care of themselves.  Thus reflected in the price of the original lots.   Yes leaving the county takes away an expensive security blanket.  However if one does not have the courage to try something new voluntarily.  We will always be on the reactive, and paying dearly for it, and when it evolves at emergency prices.  So ask yourself, if you were convinced by experts with decades of experience, at a town hall meeting, they could do the job for our community better and cheaper, would you choose to leave the county?  Or, would you choose to do nothing, receive the minimum in services, and wind up paying more for it when it becomes and emergency?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Now to the details of my research:    http://www.bakmanwater.com/water-meters

Over the past 2 weeks, I have met with Tim Bakman, Brett Frazier, Don Smith, Rod Bradley, Ferguson.  After meeting with Tim Bakman from Bakman water company. I learned they are the same company who is managing Root Creek Water (Riverstone).  They have been in business since 1940, and currently still own and manage their own system, which spans from Willow to Fowler and Olive to Kings Canyon.  They currently charge under $60 per month/ per connection for water services.  On meters they charge per 100 CF is $.97 roughly per 1000 gallons (less than City of Fresno) (Example of our water usage average high month 14,000,000 gallons divided equally would be $41 each plus any fixed costs).  Tim also feels that he could manage our water system for far less that the county, and his company could install the meters for less than $1000 each.  If his company is out here managing Riverstone, why not pay him to manage ours?  Why would we pay Riverstone to connect to their groundwater system, when Bakman could be doing the same thing for us?

Bakman’s company has 11 wells, in their own system, they perform all of the state required testing, since 1940.  They handle day to day management, and billing.  I spoke with Rod Bradley from Bradley and Sons Well Drilling, I was very impressed with their knowledge.  They both pointed to an Engineer named Ken Shmidt the guru of most wells in the Valley, who is involved with the majority of wells developed in this area.  There is also a general contractor by the name of Don Smith who manages projects such as a new well.  Roughly the cost of a new well is $500,000 to $700,0000  Rod said when we find a location, he drills a test hole, takes samples every 10 feet, sends them to Ken.  Ken (engineer) analyzes the soil and makes engineering instructions on the materials needed to best protect the well from sand and such; he designs the well to be constructed as needed in his plans.  We could have these experts come and speak to us at a town hall meeting.

I met with Supervisor Brett Frazier on Thursday 9/29 to inquire about the real possibility of privatizing our water system.  He agrees it is a real possibility. The county wouldn’t mind getting out of managing, because of the difficulties surrounding the 218 election process.  He shared with me the rate study for Water District 95 MD95; (our rate study is underway), their current rate is $83 per month non-metered, their projected rate is $141/mo plus $1.63 per approx. every 1000 gallons; with yearly increases until 2020 when it gets to $159 mo plus $2.12 per approx. every 1000 gallons; that’s about $250 month for water, on averaged use.  So it probably will not pass 218, but what does that mean?  Will the state eventually start mandating improvements?  Eventually some emergency will happen, and a vote will have to pass to get it done; until then minimum services…  

Will you rely on the county, sell out, or pave your own path?

David Frisby

PS Im waiting for Mr Frazier to get back to me on the steps we would need to take to privatize, as well as processes of financing, and legal entity information.  I will post again, when I have more details.  As for now, it would be good to know how many residents would consider privatizing, if the experts were to present a solid plan for us at a town hall meeting.  I understand we would need to analyze all aspects of this decision, before we could pull the trigger.



You can respond, by clicking the "Add a Comment" at the bottom of this page.

Residents are watching,  (click above picture) and just starting to chime in.  With over 391 page views in the last 2 days.  Please contribute your thoughts an feelings, even if you think, you don't understand, or happen to make mistakes on your spelling or grammar; it only important that you participate!